That's the power of forums.
Since your average forum has begun to pount into people the 'U' word is bad I've seen a lot of hosting companies change their wording to exclude that now. That's just one example. The wealth of information of the CIHosts etc of the world is starting to be heard on a wider level.
In regard to the topic, a good time to go dedicated is the same moment you find yourself paying your upstream the same amount as a dedicated server would cost. Financialy it's an easier transistion so you're not playing catch up afterwards. It's very tempting to leap early I agree but to hold off as long as you can will give you more time to select the best host for your needs. There are a lot of $99 servers out there that aren't up to the task, being very under powered for hosting. If you're paying your upstream $400 a month then you'll have plenty to spare for a good ded. option.
The ideal is you start off small, outgrow reselling then make one move to a dedicated provider. From there you should be able to just plug more in as you go till you're larger enough to build your own NOC. Of course it's not always that easy. Even good providers fall out of favour as better ones appear. The last thing you want to do though is to hop all over the place sending your customers into an early grave by having to e-mail them with the news of yet another NOC change
Knowledge is power. The longer you spend on research the easier things will be down the track. Last year saw a ton of people jumping from Alabanza to VDI over a few days of slowdown. Currently those same people are looking at weeks of slowdown and outages, and are jumping to a different NOC again. Is it their fault? Not really. No-one including VDI could predict was was going to happen. If there was fault at all it was that they jumped to quickly. It's a good thing to be concerned about your business (and that of your customers), but it's another to go off half-****ed.
We'd be making more money if we weren't at Alabanza for sure. Those things don't come cheap, but until something appears that will provide a better solution for our customers we'll be staying where we are. They're known for their reliabilty and stability (the servers), and by default then, so are we.
As for revenue, I'd like to think a good ballpark would be $600 per month per server. That's basing it on a $400 a month server with 50% extra for bandwidth overage and incidentals like server setup, mechant fees, advertising etc. That's aside from the profit on top of that you should expect from that outlay - it's just what you expect to spend. It can be cheaper, and it can be a *lot* higher.
Greg Moore